2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1977 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1977 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 5 | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |