2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 5 | Telstar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |