2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 5 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 5 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2420 mm |
