2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1990 Opel Omega. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1990 Opel Omega.
Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Opel Omega. (151 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1990 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 5 | Omega |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |