2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1994 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Pontiac Firebird (275 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1994 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1994 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 5 | Firebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 275 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |