2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 214. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 214 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1995 Rover 214. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 214.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 214. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 214.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 5 | 1995 Rover 214 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 5 | 214 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
