2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1999 Vector M12
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1999 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1999 Vector M12 | |
Make | Mazda | Vector |
Model | 5 | M12 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 484 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |