2006 Mazda 5 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 5 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 5 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |