2006 Mazda 5 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 5 weights approximately 162 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura CSX (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (185 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Acura CSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 5 | CSX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |