2006 Mazda 5 vs. 2011 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2011 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2011 Renault Grand Scenic. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Grand Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Grand Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 2011 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 5 | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |