2006 Mazda 5 vs. 2012 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2012 Renault Trafic is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2012 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Trafic (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 2012 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 5 | Trafic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 90 L |