2006 Mazda 5 vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | 5 | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2909 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |