2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | PV |
Year Released | 2006 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |