2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1944 Packard 12
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,756 cc (12 cylinders), 1944 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (216 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1944 Packard 12. (173 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1944 Packard 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Packard 12 weights approximately 1300 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1944 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1944 Packard 12 | |
Make | Mazda | Packard |
Model | 6 | 12 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 7756 cc |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3440 mm |