2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 6 | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3160 mm |