2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher.
Because 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6 | 300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |