2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1953 Steyr 2000. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1953 Steyr 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1953 Steyr 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Steyr 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |