2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 NSU Sport
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 NSU Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 NSU Sport would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1960 NSU Sport. (30 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 NSU Sport.
Because 1960 NSU Sport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 NSU Sport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1960 NSU Sport | |
Make | Mazda | NSU |
Model | 6 | Sport |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 583 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 6.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |