2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 83 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1978 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 54 L |