2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 226 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 6 | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 6 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1481 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |
