2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2789 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |