2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1970 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (216 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1970 Mercury Comet. (82 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mercury Comet weights approximately 100 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1970 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercury Comet. (178 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1970 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 6 | Comet |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2782 cc |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2800 mm |