2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher.
Because 1975 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |