2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 265. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 265 weights approximately 271 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1976 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 265. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 265 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2664 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |