2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher.
Because 1980 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |