2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Mercury LN7
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury LN7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury LN7 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Mercury LN7. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury LN7.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury LN7. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury LN7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1982 Mercury LN7 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 6 | LN7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 43 L |