2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2213 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |