2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 249 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1486 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2420 mm |