2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1984 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1984 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Gemini weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1984 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 6 | 1984 Holden Gemini | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Gemini |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1584 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
