2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1166 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 6 | Corniche |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6750 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2286 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |