2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1990 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1990 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Apollo weights approximately 85 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1990 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 6 | Apollo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |