2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (197 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 381 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (291 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 6 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3351 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |