2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Pontiac Firebird (275 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 600 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1993 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 6 | Firebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 5733 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 275 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |