2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 6 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 200 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1994 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
