2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Volvo 460
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 460. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 460. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Volvo 460 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 460. (175 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1994 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 460 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1721 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |