2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 246 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1769 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |