2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1998 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1998 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |