2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 BMW Z3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW Z3 weights approximately 244 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1999 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 6 | 1999 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Mazda | BMW |
| Model | 6 | Z3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1897 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |
