2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (208 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 596 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (270 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 6 | Omega |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2962 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |