2006 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 Seat Formula
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Formula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Formula would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Formula (238 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Formula should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 486 kg more than 1999 Seat Formula.
Because 1999 Seat Formula is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Formula will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Formula (301 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Seat Formula will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 1999 Seat Formula | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 6 | Formula |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1982 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |