2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 239 kg more than 2000 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 6 | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1324 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |