2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 6 | X20 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |