2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Lynx would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2003 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 19 kg more than 2003 Ford Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2003 Ford Lynx | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Lynx |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1595 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |