2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZR weights approximately 210 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 6 | ZR |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1396 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |