2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Opel Combo
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Combo would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Combo. (138 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2003 Opel Combo | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 6 | Combo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 52 L |