2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Peugeot 307. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Peugeot 307 would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 307. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 307. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 307. (202 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 307.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2003 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | 307 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 202 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |