2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2008 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2008 Renault Scenic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2008 Renault Scenic. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Scenic weights approximately 270 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Scenic. (128 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2008 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |