2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2008 Rover 45
To start off, 2008 Rover 45 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2008 Rover 45. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 206 kg more than 2008 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 45. (139 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2008 Rover 45 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 45 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1588 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |