2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 207 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2009 Peugeot 207. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Peugeot 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Peugeot 207 weights approximately 102 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Peugeot 207. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2009 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | 207 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1586 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1231 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |