2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Honda Stream
To start off, 2010 Honda Stream is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2010 Honda Stream. (123 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Stream. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Stream weights approximately 305 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Stream. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2010 Honda Stream | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 6 | Stream |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1668 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1434 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |